Reflection Paper For A Debate On Military Drones

Reflection Paper for a debate on military drones.

Obligation – US – power over countries, acting as superpower, responsibility to protect

Nuclear devices work too – just because it works – minimalize civ casualty

Supply Is a problem --- okay not relevant, existent regardless of solution QUESTIONED EFFICIENCY

Movement not a problem by drones – gives legality without justification to intervene

MORE INTERVENTIONS drones – cheaper – no cost of mobilization

Intervention with no repercussion, intervention you have to question the consequences of the conflict and whether it will be won, while with military drones can be used with no real oversight of future consequence + easier than negotiation, no cost if goes wrong.

DRONES SECRET – accountability removed, but also strike team can be kept secret

DRONES Harmful – less accurate bc of sky attacks, large bombs, drop and destroy surroundings.

US army doesn’t have to share military operations information, not their issue – legitimacy arg supported opp

Sovereignty – global issues // CREATING HATRED - // DRAWNING NO COMPARATIVE OF WHY GROUND INVASION IS WORSE THAN DRONE REPERCUSSIONS

We need to fight wars well – SOLDIERS EXPOSED TO TERRORS OF WAR – hate against citizens – no talking about strike teams, surveillance // no response on hatred by reign of fire by missiles // vs interests of citizens –